Anarchy, Anarchists, and Anarchocrats

Anarchy

Anarchy, in Sid Meyer’s Civilization video game series, is a state of upheaval where government is temporarily unable to provide cities with logistical bonuses. Although the absence of government is the most common meaning given for Anarchy, there are others.

“Anarchy is the natural state without the modernized cultural spin. It is what we truly are and how we actually behave . . . anarchy is human nature.” ~ Rachel Haywire – Attack The System dot com

Pure Anarchy, here, is a universal force embedded in human nature which rejects coercive social pressures. It is not only a force, but a primordial state existing outside of culture. It is the idealized individuality of the motherless Padmasambhava.

Anarchists

The common definition of Anarchy gives way to the stereotypical Anarchist bomber who simply wants to create a lapse in government through violence. Of course, like most people, very few Anarchists are violent. Not only that, but there is disagreement about which kinds of governance are benign and which must be abolished. Left-Anarchists may see Capitalist power as the primary coercive force, whereas Anarcho-Capitalists see Democracy as the major offender. In either case, both sides acknowledge the necessity of one flavor of coercion or another, in order to reach a maximized state of liberty. These kinds of Anarchists regularly use coercion, such as transgressive speech acts or traffic disruptions, in an attempt to decrease the sum total of coercion.

“The heavens and the earth are not partial to institutionalized morality.” ~ Lau Tzu — Dao De Jing

Existence as a social animal implies coercion. Seemingly, the only way to escape the social situation is death or exile, and moral codes founded on non-coercion quickly become a platform for coercion. This Pure Anarchy is not an end that can be attained through sustained effort but rather an ideal means. To be an Anarchist, in this sense, is profound way-making, nothing short of enlightenment.

Anarchocrats

“The ends justify the means.” ~ Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli

Anarchocrats, a purposefully derisive neologism, are Anarchists with an endgame. These are the mad bombers, the Left-Anarchist communal ideologues, and the Anarcho-Capitalist profit-utopians. Anarchocrats are instrumentalists; they believe ideology can only succeed when coercively imposed on the whole of society. Then the sheeple will see the light! Only the Anarchocrats are trying to coerce people into non-coercion, something has short-circuited, and somehow through some bizarre self-deception they’ve convinced themselves this could possibly work. If only they got more people on the streets shouting, if only somehow conditions got worse! Then! Then we’ll find Anarchocrats everywhere!

Conclusion

There seems to be little wisdom in adopting a label that is commonly understood as violent and dangerous. Still, it’s a real cool mark of a true counter-cultural revolutionary to proclaim oneself an Anarchist and take all the oh-so-misunderstood negative denotations and connotations which come with it. Sheep in wolves’ clothing are nothing new, a get-up which inspires fear. It’s a quick ego boost and a rush of power, but it has nothing whatsoever to do with non-coercion.

11 comments to Anarchy, Anarchists, and Anarchocrats

  • ravada

    I can’t say much on this topic that you didn’t already, so I won’t even try.

    Good article guys

  • Billy Gay Cyrus

    That is so true. When I tell the line of men there is no more room for them to gangbang my ass they all begin screaming…ME ME ME…Pick me. LOL…to tell the truth there is always room for one more pecker up my ass…

  • CHRISTIAN WESTON CHANDLER

    i heard anarchist girls wear blue wigs. i wear a jean skirt, i want to make my daughter crystal.

  • The non-coercion coercion ticket is the ticket to true coercion.

    • Speedy McFlimflam

      In the world of the con, the best con is when you repeatedly tell the mark that unfortunately there is no more room on the con. This leads the mark to beg and plead “to just let one more player on board”. The mark begs to be conned. This is precisely the dialectic by which non-coercive force operates.

      • Hegemon

        I’m sorry, but there’s just no room for your shimsham around these parts.

        • Kilgoar

          Hey folks, I got this great new thing. Social Media Profiles. You don’t think you can put your whole personality into a digital object? Me neither. Just try it. There’s no way you can pull that off, dumbass.

  • Dr. Catchpole P. Spigot

    Jeet Kune Do seems to suggest that the only appropriate label is the label of having no labial.